![]() The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. In other words, there are still more than two months until new chips are released, so the above tests may not reflect the actual performance and power consumption of the final product. Intel will most likely announce the 13th generation of Core processors in September, which will go on sale in October. Power consumption of Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i9-12900KF. The new chip sometimes consumed 3 watts less than its predecessor, but sometimes up to 44 watts more. ![]() Source: Twitter / performance increased, so did the Core i9-13900K’s power consumption, which was higher than the Core i9-12900KF in most tests. For example, at 1080p, the resolution most commonly used by testers to test processor performance, the Core i9-13900K’s qualifying pattern was an average of 4.46% faster than its predecessor.Ĭomparative performance of Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i9-12900KF. Twitter user created a comparison table and a chart based on it, which shows the increase in minimum, average and maximum frames per second as a function of a given resolution. The minimum frame rate in games has also increased by 11-28%, depending on the resolution. The biggest performance gain is seen in tasks that rely heavily on processor power (e.g. In almost all gaming tests, Raptor Lake showed the best results. Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i9-12900KF in games. For gaming tests, the Chinese tester used the flagship MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X instead of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The PC was equipped with an ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme motherboard and 32 GB DDR5-6400 RAM. The same platform as last time was used for the experiment. In addition, the performance of the chip was tested in the 3DMark TimeSpy and Firestrike synthetic tests. The Core i9-13900K has been tested in Horizon Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2, FarCry 6, Forza Horizon 5, Monster Hunter: Rise, PUBG, Final Fantasy Endwalker and CSGO. However, the difference between the processors has narrowed significantly. In gaming tests, the lead of the new chip remained. In the first part of its video review, Extreme Player paid attention to the performance of the pre-production Core i9-13900K in various synthetic tests, where it was 10-35% faster than the current-gen flagship Core i9-12900KF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |